Asphalt vs Concrete Harrison Township Michigan
We Are Locally Owned
& Operated For 36 Years
Contact Us Today!
About Asphalt vs Concrete
Introduction
Choosing the right driveway material might seem like a daunting task, especially when you’re faced with the common debate – Asphalt vs Concrete. Property owners often grapple with decisions such as black top driveway vs concrete or asphalt driveway cost vs concrete. This guide aims to provide detailed insights into these choices, focusing on various scenarios like cost comparisons, longevity, and aesthetics. Our aim is to enable you to make informed decisions for your commercial properties.
Understanding Asphalt and Concrete
Before we delve into the intricacies of the Asphalt vs Concrete discussion, it’s necessary to understand what each material represents. Asphalt, or “black top,” is a composite material often used for road surfaces, parking lots, and driveways. It’s known for its durability and resilience against changing weather conditions.
On the other hand, concrete is a mix of sand, water, and cement that dries into a hard and durable surface. It’s widely used for sidewalks, foundations, and driveways. Both materials have their strengths and weaknesses, which is why the choice often boils down to factors such as location, budget, and personal preferences.
Blacktop vs Concrete Driveway Cost
Moving on to the cost aspect, the asphalt driveway cost vs concrete is often a critical determinant. While upfront costs for material and installation may vary, asphalt is typically less expensive to install than concrete. However, considering the cost of asphalt vs concrete over its lifespan, concrete might emerge as the economical choice due to its durability and lower long-term maintenance costs.
Cost of Asphalt vs Concrete
Nonetheless, location-specific factors such as climate and availability can also influence the cost of blacktop vs concrete. For instance, in colder climates, asphalt might be a viable choice due to its capacity to withstand freeze-thaw cycles better than concrete. Simultaneously, in warmer climates, concrete’s ability to resist softening and rutting may edge out asphalt in the long-term value discourse.
Concrete vs Pavement Driveway
In terms of aesthetics and flexibility in design, you might want to evaluate further into concrete vs pavement driveway. While concrete provides numerous design options like stamping and coloring, asphalt has a more uniform look. The choice here relies heavily on your aesthetic preferences and the visual appeal you wish to achieve for your commercial property.
Driveway Paving vs Concrete and Paver Driveway Cost vs Concrete
Another factor to consider is the method of installation or the driveway paving vs concrete discussion. In terms of installation time, asphalt driveways can be installed and used more quickly than concrete ones. However, the latter tends to last longer before any major repairs are needed. When evaluating paver driveway cost vs concrete, the former might be a pricy option but offers higher aesthetic flexibility with numerous design possibilities.
Driveway Concrete vs Pavers Cost
When exploring driveway concrete vs pavers cost, both short-term and long-term aspects come into play. While concrete potentially offers lower initial cost and durability, pavers provide aesthetic appeal and easier repair in case of damage, as only the affected pavers need replacement. Yet again, the asphalt vs paver driveway choices boil down to your specific circumstances, project goals, and budget constraints.
Conclusion
Whether it’s blacktop vs concrete driveway cost or aesthetic versatility of concrete vs pavement driveway, the choice is influenced by numerous factors unique to your commercial property and business objectives. Longevity, climate-resistance, aesthetic value, maintenance needs, and budget are just a few aspects to consider in the asphalt vs concrete debate. This guide’s aim is to create a comprehensive starting point for property owners to help them make an informed choice when choosing their driveway materials. To explore or discuss further about your unique needs and options, feel free to reach out to us for a professional consultation.
Taking the Next Step
There is no one-size-fits-all solution in the Asphalt vs Concrete debate; the best answer is the one that meets your specific needs and preferences. Our experienced team can guide you through the process, ensuring that you get the best quality and value for your commercial property.
Contact Us Today for a FREE
Asphalt vs Concrete Quote
Asphalt vs Concrete Gallery
About Harrison Township, Michigan
History
Harrison was first designated as the new centralized location of the county seat of Clare County in 1877. It would become a replacement for Farwell, which was the first county seat when Clare County was formally organized in 1871. The Flint and Pere Marquette Railroad platted the village in 1879 and set aside property for a new county government after the previous courthouse in Farwell burned down. The Harrison post office opened on January 27, 1880 and was named after former president William Henry Harrison. The new community incorporated as a village in 1885 and later as a city in 1891.
Geography
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the city has a total area of 4.03 square miles (10.44 km), of which 3.71 square miles (9.61 km2) is land and 0.31 square miles (0.80 km) is water.
The city’s motto is “20 Lakes in 20 Minutes” due its proximity to numerous lakes. Budd Lake is mostly located within the city limits, while the northern coastline extends into Hayes Township. The only other lake within the city limits is Little Long Lake, which also extends into Hayes Township.
Major highways
US 127 runs south–north just outside the eastern border of the city.
Bus. US 127 is a business route of US 127 that runs through the center of the city.
M-61 is a state highway that enters the west-central part of the city and then runs concurrently with Bus. US 127.
Demographics
| Census | Pop. | Note | %± |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880 | 129 | — | |
| 1890 | 752 | 482.9% | |
| 1900 | 647 | −14.0% | |
| 1910 | 543 | −16.1% | |
| 1920 | 399 | −26.5% | |
| 1930 | 458 | 14.8% | |
| 1940 | 727 | 58.7% | |
| 1950 | 884 | 21.6% | |
| 1960 | 1,072 | 21.3% | |
| 1970 | 1,460 | 36.2% | |
| 1980 | 1,700 | 16.4% | |
| 1990 | 1,835 | 7.9% | |
| 2000 | 2,108 | 14.9% | |
| 2010 | 2,114 | 0.3% | |
| 2020 | 2,150 | 1.7% | |
| U.S. Decennial Census | |||
2010 census
As of the census of 2010, there were 2,114 people, 913 households, and 524 families residing in the city. The population density was 568.3 inhabitants per square mile (219.4/km2). There were 1,306 housing units at an average density of 351.1 per square mile (135.6/km). The racial makeup of the city was 93.7% White, 1.7% African American, 0.8% Native American, 0.5% Asian, 0.2% from other races, and 3.1% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 2.5% of the population.
There were 913 households, of which 26.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 37.0% were married couples living together, 15.9% had a female householder with no husband present, 4.5% had a male householder with no wife present, and 42.6% were non-families. 37.2% of all households were made up of individuals, and 17.5% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.18 and the average family size was 2.79.
The median age in the city was 42.1 years. 21% of residents were under the age of 18; 10.8% were between the ages of 18 and 24; 22.4% were from 25 to 44; 27.4% were from 45 to 64; and 18.4% were 65 years of age or older. The gender makeup of the city was 49.1% male and 50.9% female.
2000 census
As of the census of 2000, there were 2,108 people, 857 households, and 526 families residing in the city. The population density was 563.3 inhabitants per square mile (217.5/km2). There were 1,187 housing units at an average density of 317.2 per square mile (122.5/km). The racial makeup of the city was 94.78% White, 2.04% African American, 0.62% Native American, 0.71% Asian, 0.43% from other races, and 1.42% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 1.47% of the population.
There were 857 households, out of which 26.6% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 46.0% were married couples living together, 12.5% had a female householder with no husband present, and 38.6% were non-families. 35.2% of all households were made up of individuals, and 18.2% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.24 and the average family size was 2.83.
In the city, the population was spread out, with 22.3% under the age of 18, 9.7% from 18 to 24, 25.6% from 25 to 44, 24.7% from 45 to 64, and 17.7% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 39 years. For every 100 females, there were 93.6 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.5 males.
The median income for a household in the city was $26,392, and the median income for a family was $35,179. Males had a median income of $32,500 versus $20,909 for females. The per capita income for the city was $15,443. About 14.1% of families and 18.5% of the population were below the poverty line, including 20.8% of those under age 18 and 15.1% of those age 65 or over.
Education
The city of Harrison is served entirely by Harrison Community Schools, which is centrally located within the city and serves a large part of the northern portion of the county.
Mid Michigan Community College has a Harrison campus located just to the southeast in Hatton Township.
Contact Us Today for a FREE
Asphalt vs Concrete Quote
Our Asphalt vs Concrete services are available in Harrison Township as well as all of Macomb County.
Our dedicated team at D&J Contracting Inc is at-the-ready to provide you with great customer service and first class Asphalt vs Concrete services. Reach out to us at (586) 954-0008 to discuss your Asphalt vs Concrete needs today!