Asphalt vs Concrete Harrison Michigan
We Are Locally Owned
& Operated For 36 Years
About Asphalt vs Concrete
Introduction
Your driveway can be more than just a functional space for your cars to rest, it can also make a significant statement about your commercial property. When it comes to creating your ideal driveway, one of the first decisions you’ll need to make is whether to use asphalt or concrete. Both offer unique and attractive properties, but each also comes with its advantages and disadvantages. In this guide, we will delve deep into ‘Asphalt vs Concrete’ dynamics, exploring the cost, benefits, durability, and aesthetic appeal of both materials. We will also compare asphalt with other alternatives like pavers.
Black top Driveway vs. Concrete
Blacktop, commonly known as asphalt, and concrete driveways differ significantly in their appearance and makeup. A blacktop driveway has a smooth, consistent surface, making it visually pleasing and comfortable to drive on. However, it requires frequent sealcoating to maintain its appearance. On the other hand, concrete offers more flexibility when it comes to design and color, but it can show signs of cracking under stressful conditions.
Asphalt Driveway Cost vs. Concrete
Determining the asphalt driveway cost vs concrete involves analyzing the installation, maintenance, and longevity of both materials. Typically, asphalt driveways have lower upfront installation costs than concrete. However, they require more frequent maintenance, which might raise the long-term costs. Comparatively, concrete driveways cost more initially but require less maintenance over time, potentially resulting in reduced long-term expense.
Concrete vs. Pavement Driveway
While exploring driveway concrete vs pavers cost, the choice often comes down to budget and preference. Concrete driveways offer a sleek, minimalist look, but repairing cracks can be costly. Alternatively, pavement driveways, often featuring cobblestone or brick pavers, offer a visually striking aesthetic. They might cost more upfront than concrete but can be cost-effective in the long run as individual pavers can be replaced if damaged.
Comparing Cost of Asphalt vs. Concrete, and Blacktop vs. Concrete
Whether assessing the cost of blacktop vs concrete or asphalt vs concrete, it’s crucial to consider both initial and long-term expenses. While asphalt tends to be cheaper initially, its maintenance costs add up over time. Conversely, although concrete has a higher upfront cost, it often requires less frequent and less costly maintenance, making it potentially more affordable over time.
Driveway Paving: Asphalt vs Paver Driveway
When choosing between an asphalt vs paver driveway, consider your specific needs and preferences. Asphalt driveways offer a uniform look and feel, making them ideal for those who prefer simplicity. Paver driveways, on the other hand, come in various colors, shapes, and sizes, allowing for a high degree of customization. However, they tend to be more expensive than both asphalt and concrete driveways.
Practical Tips
When choosing the material for your driveway, consider factors such as your climate, frequency of use, and personal aesthetic. For instance, asphalt is better suited to colder climates as it’s less likely to crack from frost heave. On the other hand, concrete is more durable in high-heat areas. Durability should not be ignored, particularly for commercial properties with high traffic.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the choice between asphalt vs concrete depends largely on your requirements, budget, and personal preference. Asphalt offers a reliable and cost-effective option with less initial but more long-term cost. Concrete, while more expensive upfront, provides a durable and low-maintenance solution. Paver driveways, while costly, bring a high degree of customization and easy repairability.
Ready for Your New Driveway?
Whether you’re leaning towards a sleek concrete driveway, a classic asphalt one, or consuming towards distinctive pavers, turning your vision into reality is a call away. With a wealth of knowledge and a passion for perfection, our team is ready to design and install a driveway tailored to your taste and budget. Contact us today for a consultation or for further information on asphalt vs concrete driveways.
Contact Us Today for a FREE
Asphalt vs Concrete Quote
About Harrison, Michigan
History
Harrison was first designated as the new centralized location of the county seat of Clare County in 1877. It would become a replacement for Farwell, which was the first county seat when Clare County was formally organized in 1871. The Flint and Pere Marquette Railroad platted the village in 1879 and set aside property for a new county government after the previous courthouse in Farwell burned down. The Harrison post office opened on January 27, 1880 and was named after former president William Henry Harrison. The new community incorporated as a village in 1885 and later as a city in 1891.
Geography
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the city has a total area of 4.03 square miles (10.44 km), of which 3.71 square miles (9.61 km2) is land and 0.31 square miles (0.80 km) is water.
The city’s motto is “20 Lakes in 20 Minutes” due its proximity to numerous lakes. Budd Lake is mostly located within the city limits, while the northern coastline extends into Hayes Township. The only other lake within the city limits is Little Long Lake, which also extends into Hayes Township.
Major highways
US 127 runs south–north just outside the eastern border of the city.
Bus. US 127 is a business route of US 127 that runs through the center of the city.
M-61 is a state highway that enters the west-central part of the city and then runs concurrently with Bus. US 127.
Demographics
| Census | Pop. | Note | %± |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880 | 129 | — | |
| 1890 | 752 | 482.9% | |
| 1900 | 647 | −14.0% | |
| 1910 | 543 | −16.1% | |
| 1920 | 399 | −26.5% | |
| 1930 | 458 | 14.8% | |
| 1940 | 727 | 58.7% | |
| 1950 | 884 | 21.6% | |
| 1960 | 1,072 | 21.3% | |
| 1970 | 1,460 | 36.2% | |
| 1980 | 1,700 | 16.4% | |
| 1990 | 1,835 | 7.9% | |
| 2000 | 2,108 | 14.9% | |
| 2010 | 2,114 | 0.3% | |
| 2020 | 2,150 | 1.7% | |
| U.S. Decennial Census | |||
2010 census
As of the census of 2010, there were 2,114 people, 913 households, and 524 families residing in the city. The population density was 568.3 inhabitants per square mile (219.4/km2). There were 1,306 housing units at an average density of 351.1 per square mile (135.6/km). The racial makeup of the city was 93.7% White, 1.7% African American, 0.8% Native American, 0.5% Asian, 0.2% from other races, and 3.1% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 2.5% of the population.
There were 913 households, of which 26.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 37.0% were married couples living together, 15.9% had a female householder with no husband present, 4.5% had a male householder with no wife present, and 42.6% were non-families. 37.2% of all households were made up of individuals, and 17.5% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.18 and the average family size was 2.79.
The median age in the city was 42.1 years. 21% of residents were under the age of 18; 10.8% were between the ages of 18 and 24; 22.4% were from 25 to 44; 27.4% were from 45 to 64; and 18.4% were 65 years of age or older. The gender makeup of the city was 49.1% male and 50.9% female.
2000 census
As of the census of 2000, there were 2,108 people, 857 households, and 526 families residing in the city. The population density was 563.3 inhabitants per square mile (217.5/km2). There were 1,187 housing units at an average density of 317.2 per square mile (122.5/km). The racial makeup of the city was 94.78% White, 2.04% African American, 0.62% Native American, 0.71% Asian, 0.43% from other races, and 1.42% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 1.47% of the population.
There were 857 households, out of which 26.6% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 46.0% were married couples living together, 12.5% had a female householder with no husband present, and 38.6% were non-families. 35.2% of all households were made up of individuals, and 18.2% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.24 and the average family size was 2.83.
In the city, the population was spread out, with 22.3% under the age of 18, 9.7% from 18 to 24, 25.6% from 25 to 44, 24.7% from 45 to 64, and 17.7% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 39 years. For every 100 females, there were 93.6 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.5 males.
The median income for a household in the city was $26,392, and the median income for a family was $35,179. Males had a median income of $32,500 versus $20,909 for females. The per capita income for the city was $15,443. About 14.1% of families and 18.5% of the population were below the poverty line, including 20.8% of those under age 18 and 15.1% of those age 65 or over.
Education
The city of Harrison is served entirely by Harrison Community Schools, which is centrally located within the city and serves a large part of the northern portion of the county.
Mid Michigan Community College has a Harrison campus located just to the southeast in Hatton Township.
Contact Us Today for a FREE
Asphalt vs Concrete Quote
Our Asphalt vs Concrete services are available in Harrison as well as all of Macomb County.
Our dedicated team at D&J Contracting Inc is at-the-ready to provide you with great customer service and first class Asphalt vs Concrete services. Reach out to us at (586) 954-0008 to discuss your Asphalt vs Concrete needs today!