Parking Lot Resurfacing inTroy, MI
Cost-Effective Resurfacing to Enhance Parking Lot Longevity
We Are Locally Owned & Operated For Over 37 Years
Contact Us Today!
We Serve Businesses In And Around The Following Cities:
About Parking Lot Resurfacing
Comprehensive Guide to Parking Lot Resurfacing for Commercial Properties in Troy
The Need for Parking Lot Resurfacing
In the bustling city of Troy, where businesses thrive amidst a sea of competitors, first impressions matter immensely. A well-maintained parking lot is often the first point of contact for customers, setting the tone for their entire experience. It is crucial for commercial properties to ensure that their parking areas are not only functional but also visually appealing. This is where the concept of parking lot resurfacing becomes paramount. Resurfacing not only revitalizes the appearance of an asphalt surface but also extends its lifespan, offering both aesthetic and practical benefits.
In an urban setting like Troy, the consistent growth of commercial activities has led to increased vehicular traffic, resulting in the accelerated wear and tear of parking spaces. Businesses are constantly seeking effective ways to enhance their curb appeal while maximizing safety and efficiency. Parking lot resurfacing emerges as a vital solution, restoring the vibrancy of the space while addressing underlying structural issues. This guide delves deep into the process, benefits, and real-world applications of parking lot resurfacing, providing a comprehensive understanding for property managers and business owners.
Understanding the Resurfacing Process
Before embarking on a parking lot resurfacing project, it is essential to grasp the fundamental steps involved. The process begins with a thorough inspection of the existing surface to assess the extent of damage and identify any underlying issues that need addressing. Common problems include cracks, potholes, and drainage issues. Once the evaluation is complete, the next step is cleaning and preparing the surface. This involves removing debris, dirt, and oil stains, which can affect the adhesion of new asphalt layers.
Following preparation, the resurfacing itself begins. This typically involves adding a new layer of asphalt over the existing surface. It’s a strategic choice compared to complete reconstruction, as resurfacing is less disruptive and more cost-effective. The fresh layer not only smooths out imperfections but also enhances the durability and appearance of the parking lot. Advanced techniques, such as milling, may be employed to ensure optimal bonding between the new and old layers, further fortifying the structure against future wear.
The final stages of the resurfacing process include compacting the asphalt to achieve the desired density and texture. Once the surface is compacted, line striping and marking are applied. This step ensures clear demarcation of parking spaces, directional arrows, and other essential indicators, all of which contribute to efficient traffic flow and enhanced safety.
The Benefits of Resurfacing
While the aesthetic improvement of a freshly resurfaced parking lot is readily apparent, the benefits extend far beyond the visual domain. One of the primary advantages is the substantial increase in surface longevity. By addressing minor damages early and overlaying the surface with fresh asphalt, businesses can prevent the escalation of structural issues, effectively extending the lifespan of their parking lots. This proactive approach reduces the need for frequent, costly repairs and more disruptive reconstruction efforts.
Moreover, parking lot resurfacing enhances safety, a critical concern for any commercial property. Cracks and potholes pose potential hazards to both pedestrians and vehicles. By resurfacing, these risks are mitigated, ensuring a safer environment for customers and employees alike. Furthermore, a smooth, well-maintained surface improves vehicle traction, reducing the likelihood of accidents caused by slippery or uneven terrain.
The environmental impact of resurfacing cannot be overlooked either. By opting to resurface instead of replacing an entire lot, businesses contribute to sustainability by minimizing waste. The ability to reuse the existing asphalt structure aligns with green initiatives prevalent within the city of Troy and beyond, promoting eco-friendly business practices.
Parking Lot Resurfacing Cost Considerations
Cost is often a central concern when contemplating parking lot resurfacing, but it is important to recognize it as an investment in the property’s future. Several factors influence the final cost, including the size of the area, the severity of the existing damage, and the choice of materials. While asphalt remains the most popular choice due to its durability and cost-effectiveness, variations in quality and thickness may affect pricing.
Working with reputable contractors, such as D&J Contracting, ensures that businesses receive accurate assessments and competitive pricing without compromising on quality. Their expertise in the field provides valuable guidance, helping property managers navigate the complexities of resurfacing projects while adhering to budgetary constraints.
Ultimately, the cost of resurfacing should be weighed against the long-term savings derived from reduced repair needs and enhanced property value. An attractive, functional parking lot is a tangible asset, drawing in customers and contributing to a positive business image in Troy’s competitive landscape.
Localization and Real-World Applications
In the vibrant city of Troy, parking lot resurfacing plays a pivotal role in various commercial sectors. Retail outlets, office complexes, and hospitality venues alike benefit from maintaining pristine parking facilities. Businesses located in popular districts, where high footfall and vehicular traffic are expected, stand to gain significantly from investing in resurfacing solutions.
Consider, for instance, a shopping plaza located in the thriving heart of Troy. A well-maintained parking lot can significantly enhance the shopping experience, encouraging customers to return. Conversely, a deteriorating lot may deter potential visitors, impacting foot traffic and ultimately the businesses within. Resurfacing not only ameliorates appearance and functionality but also conveys a sense of professionalism and attention to detail.
Moreover, for commercial properties seeking to attract new tenants, pristine parking facilities serve as a unique selling proposition. Prospective tenants are more likely to favor spaces that demonstrate proactive maintenance and investment, viewing them as indicators of a landlord’s commitment to quality and tenant satisfaction.
The Role of Professional Services
Engaging a professional resurfacing service provides businesses with peace of mind and assurance that the project will be executed efficiently and correctly. With myriad contractors available, it is crucial to choose a company with a proven track record of delivering high-quality results. D&J Contracting, for example, stands out in the Troy area for their expertise, reliability, and customer-centric approach.
Professional services ensure that the resurfacing process meets stringent quality standards, from the initial assessment to the final execution. They are equipped to handle unforeseen challenges, such as inclement weather conditions or unexpected sub-surface issues, without compromising project timelines or quality. Furthermore, they employ best practices to minimize disruption to business operations, coordinating work schedules to avoid peak business hours whenever possible.
By entrusting resurfacing to seasoned professionals, commercial properties in Troy safeguard against subpar workmanship and future complications, thereby preserving their investment and reputation.
Final Reflections
Parking lot resurfacing is an essential undertaking for commercial properties, yielding substantial benefits in terms of appearance, safety, and longevity. In a dynamic city like Troy, where competition is fierce, businesses cannot afford to overlook the importance of maintaining high-standard parking facilities. From reducing long-term maintenance costs to enhancing customer satisfaction, the merits of resurfacing are clear and compelling.
For businesses ready to elevate their properties and convey a commitment to quality, engaging a trusted contractor such as D&J Contracting offers unrivaled expertise and results. By prioritizing the upkeep of their parking lots, commercial properties not only enhance their immediate environment but also lay the groundwork for sustained success in Troy’s commercial landscape.
Parking Lot Resurfacing Gallery
Call Us Today to receive your Free Quote for
Parking Lot Resurfacing in Troy
Serving: Troy, Michigan
About Troy, Michigan
The earliest recorded purchases of land in what was known as Troy Township occurred in 1819. A couple of years later, a settlement known as Troy Corners was established due to Johnson Niles buying 160 acres in the region. The area is currently the north-central area of Troy. In 1827 Troy Township was established. In 1955, Troy was officially incorporated primarily as a strategy for preventing border cities from taking more land. This also helped to establish more robust city services for Troy residents, whose numbers increased rapidly during this time due to Detroiters fleeing the city for the surrounding suburbs.
It was named after Troy, New York and the ancient city of Troy as many of the early settlers, as in much of Michigan, originated from New York.
According to the United States Census Bureau, the city has a total area of 33.64 square miles (87.13 km), of which 33.47 square miles (86.69 km) is land and 0.17 square miles (0.44 km) (0.51%) is water.
| Census | Pop. | Note | %± |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 19,402 | — | |
| 1970 | 39,419 | 103.2% | |
| 1980 | 67,102 | 70.2% | |
| 1990 | 72,884 | 8.6% | |
| 2000 | 80,959 | 11.1% | |
| 2010 | 80,980 | 0.0% | |
| 2020 | 87,294 | 7.8% | |
| 2023 (est.) | 87,339 | 0.1% | |
| U.S. Decennial Census 2018 Estimate |
|||
According to a 2018 estimate, the median income for a household in the city was $96,864, and the median income for a family was $113,640. Males had a median income of $72,005 versus $52,365 for females. The per capita income for the city was $46,664. About 5.1% of families and 7.2% of the population were below the poverty line, including 6.7% of those under age 18 and 6.1% of those age 65 or over.
As of the census of 2020, there were 87,294 people, 33,822 households, and 24,300 families living in the city. The population density was 2,609.9 inhabitants per square mile (1,007.7/km). There were 34,953 housing units at an average density of 1,044.9 inhabitants per square mile (403.4/km). The racial makeup of the city was 62.2% White, 4.0% African American, 0% Native American, 27.3% Asian, 1.2% from other races, and 5.1% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino residents of any race were 2.2% of the population.
There were 33,822 households, of which 35.4% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 60.1% were married couples living together, 8.3% had a female householder with no husband present, 3.4% had a male householder with no wife present, and 28.2% were non-families. 23.2% of all households were made up of individuals, and 10.1% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.56 and the average family size was 3.05.
The median age in the city was 43.9 years. 20.7% of residents were under the age of 18; 8.8% were between the ages of 18 and 24; 32% were from 25 to 44; 28.6% were from 45 to 64; and 19.7% were 65 years of age or older. The gender makeup of the city was 50.5% male and 49.5% female.
| Race / Ethnicity (NH = Non-Hispanic) | Pop 2000 | Pop 2010 | Pop 2020 | % 2000 | % 2010 | % 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White alone (NH) | 65,809 | 58,869 | 53,793 | 81.29% | 72.70% | 61.62% |
| Black or African American alone (NH) | 1,678 | 3,210 | 3,422 | 2.07% | 3.96% | 3.92% |
| Native American or Alaska Native alone (NH) | 105 | 124 | 108 | 0.13% | 0.15% | 0.12% |
| Asian alone (NH) | 10,713 | 15,439 | 23,788 | 13.23% | 19.07% | 27.25% |
| Pacific Islander alone (NH) | 18 | 1 | 9 | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
| Other race alone (NH) | 79 | 125 | 312 | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.36% |
| Mixed race or Multiracial (NH) | 1,373 | 1,502 | 2,908 | 1.70% | 1.85% | 3.33% |
| Hispanic or Latino (any race) | 1,184 | 1,710 | 2,954 | 1.46% | 2.11% | 3.38% |
| Total | 80,959 | 80,980 | 87,294 | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
As of the census of 2010, there were 80,980 people, 30,703 households, and 22,443 families living in the city. The population density was 2,419.5 inhabitants per square mile (934.2/km). There were 32,907 housing units at an average density of 983.2 per square mile (379.6/km). The racial makeup of the city was 74.1% White, 4.0% African American, 0.2% Native American, 19.1% Asian, 0.6% from other races, and 2.0% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino residents of any race were 2.1% of the population.
There were 30,703 households, of which 34.7% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 62.8% were married couples living together, 7.3% had a female householder with no husband present, 3.0% had a male householder with no wife present, and 26.9% were non-families. 23.4% of all households were made up of individuals, and 9.6% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.63 and the average family size was 3.14.
The median age in the city was 41.8 years. 23.8% of residents were under the age of 18; 6.7% were between the ages of 18 and 24; 24% were from 25 to 44; 31.6% were from 45 to 64; and 13.8% were 65 years of age or older. The gender makeup of the city was 49.3% male and 50.7% female.
From the census of 2000, there were 80,959 people, 30,018 households, and 21,883 families living in the city. The population density was 2,413.9 inhabitants per square mile (932.0/km). There were 30,872 housing units at an average density of 920.5 per square mile (355.4/km). The racial makeup of the city was 82.30% White, 2.09% African American, 0.15% Native American, 13.25% Asian, 0.02% Pacific Islander, 0.36% from other races, and 1.82% from two or more races. 1.46% of the population was Hispanic or Latino of any race.
There were 30,018 households, out of which 36.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 64.5% were married couples living together, 6.0% had a female householder with no husband present, and 27.1% were non-families. 22.8% of all households were made up of individuals, and 7.8% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.69 and the average family size was 3.23.
In the city 26.2% of the population was under the age of 18, 6.7% from 18 to 24, 29.8% from 25 to 44, 27.1% from 45 to 64, and 10.2% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 38 years. For every 100 females, there were 98.1 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 94.8 males.
From 1990 to 2000, of all of the municipalities in Oakland, Wayne, and Macomb counties, Troy had the highest numeric growth in the Asian population. It had 4,932 Asians according to the 1990 U.S. Census and 10,730 according to the 2000 U.S. Census, an increase of 5,798. The increase gave Troy the largest Asian-American population in the tri-county area, surpassing that of Detroit.
Troy uses the council–manager form of government, and thus is governed by a city council consisting of a mayor and six council members. The current mayor is Ethan Baker, who was elected to a four-year term on November 5, 2019. The city council appoints a City Manager, who manages the day-to-day operations of the city.
| District | Representative | Party | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11th | Haley Stevens | Democratic | 2019 |
| District | Senator | Party | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3rd | Stephanie Chang | Democratic | 2023 |
| 9th | Michael Webber | Republican | 2023 |
| District | Representative | Party | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| 56th | Sharon MacDonnell | Democratic | 2023 |
| 57th | Thomas Kuhn | Republican | 2023 |
| District | Commissioner | Party | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dave Woodward | Democratic | 2005 |
| 2 | Penny Luebs | Democratic | 2019 |
| 3 | Ann Erickson Gault | Democratic | 2023 |
Troy is the location of Walsh College, a business school, as well as branches of the University of Phoenix, Northwood University, Central Michigan University, Spring Arbor University, International Academy of Design and Technology, and Michigan State University.
There are seven school districts serving Troy; however, Troy School District serves the majority of the city limits. The district has multiple elementary schools, four middle schools, and two zoned high schools: Troy High School and Athens High School.
Three school districts have sizable portions of territory in Troy and operate at least one elementary school within the city: Avondale School District, in the north and northwestmost portion of the city; Birmingham City School District, in the southwestmost portion; and Warren Consolidated Schools, in the southeast, which operates Susick Elementary within the city. In addition, two other school districts are located in part in Troy but have no schools within the city limits: Bloomfield Hills School District, with a portion of the northwest part of the city, and Royal Oak School District, which has a very small portion of the southern part of the city. Finally, a small area of commercial property also in the south lies within the borders of Lamphere Public Schools
The Troy School District also hosts the eastern campus of the International Academy. Private schools include Bethany Christian School, Brookfield Academy, Oakland Children’s Academy, St. Mark Christian Academy and Troy Adventist Academy.
Call Us Today to receive your Free Quote for
Parking Lot Resurfacing in Troy
Related Services in Troy, Michigan
We Serve Businesses In The Following Zip Codes:
48007, 48015, 48021, 48026, 48035, 48036, 48038, 48042, 48043, 48044, 48045, 48046, 48047, 48048, 48050, 48051, 48066, 48071, 48080, 48081, 48082, 48083, 48084, 48085, 48088, 48089, 48090, 48091, 48092, 48093, 48098, 48099, 48225, 48230, 48236, 48310, 48311, 48312, 48313, 48314, 48315, 48316, 48317, 48318, 48397